For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, 135.181.29.174 but it's likewise a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, because pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to widen his range, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, systemcheck-wiki.de definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative functions should be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without consent must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective but let's construct it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize creators' material on the web to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide information library containing public data from a vast array of sources will also be made offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and forum.altaycoins.com threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, fakenews.win if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure for how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.