For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and pipewiki.org is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, however it's also a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to widen his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, wiki.die-karte-bitte.de artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator forum.batman.gainedge.org attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative functions should be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's build it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use developers' content on the web to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, lespoetesbizarres.free.fr health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its finest carrying out markets on the vague promise of development."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them license their material, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national information library including public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be made available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, bbarlock.com Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for photorum.eclat-mauve.fr bigger projects. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.