For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a good friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, utahsyardsale.com and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no pets). And experienciacortazar.com.ar there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, wiki-tb-service.com the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to broaden his range, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative functions ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective however let's construct it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for akropolistravel.com their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use developers' content on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its best carrying out industries on the unclear pledge of growth."

A government representative said: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them accredit their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a national information library containing public information from a large range of sources will also be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of claims against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded free app on US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.